Without further ado...
Did my best to make "good" decisions in terms of stats and playing time, and ensured that no one was over the IP cap. Looks like Andrew's team is the one to beat, although dropping $18 on Shoemaker didn't seem to help his pitching too terribly much.
ESPN pegs Andrew's offense as 0.0003 worth of batting average short of perfect across the board. Bullish is an understatement.
Also, Spencer assumes his standard, pre-season ranking of last.
| Hitting | Pitching | Total | |
| Andrew | 39 | 20.5 | 59.5 |
| Caleb | 27 | 25 | 52 |
| Bill | 20 | 28 | 48 |
| Kate | 14 | 33.5 | 47.5 |
| Taylor | 22 | 24 | 46 |
| Mark | 25 | 14 | 39 |
| Luke | 17 | 17.5 | 34.5 |
| Spencer | 16 | 17.5 | 33.5 |
Did my best to make "good" decisions in terms of stats and playing time, and ensured that no one was over the IP cap. Looks like Andrew's team is the one to beat, although dropping $18 on Shoemaker didn't seem to help his pitching too terribly much.
ESPN pegs Andrew's offense as 0.0003 worth of batting average short of perfect across the board. Bullish is an understatement.
Also, Spencer assumes his standard, pre-season ranking of last.
6 comments:
oh noooooooo
I have to say that I am a bit surprised to see my offense that high. My starting pitching, by design, is made up of guys who I thought ESPN was undervaluing, so it isn't surprising that I am weak there. I think the biggest factor was keepers, and I did a pretty good job avoiding colossal fuck ups overall, so the keepers took care of the rest.
You are a man of the people, Spencer. The Fangraphs Fans projections have you solidly in 4th.
WHERE IS OUR POST DRAFT ANALYSIS
Bill doesn't want to reveal everything. He thinks it gives him a competetive advantage to know the projected standings. I think he's a jerk.
I think Spencer is talking about the best pick worst pick type analysis I usually do after the draft. Not sure when or if I'll get to that this year, but there's plenty of time between now and the start of the season.
Post a Comment