The two projection system differed slightly on ERA and WHIP. Our league's average ERA according to
PECOTA is 4.17. According to the
Chone projections it is 4.00.
BP is also a tad more pessimistic with WHIP, predicting our league's average of 1.35 with
Chone at 1.32. Again, Caleb's team had the largest variation in projections with a WHIP of 1.28 (
chone) or 1.31 (
PECOTA) and an ERA of 3.88 (
Chone) or 4.19 (
PECOTA).
Remember, the rosters were set to optimize wins, so teams with good middle
relivers that could help out WHIP and ERA are not reflected in the projections.
| WHIP |
|
| ERA |
| Taylor | 1.29 |
| Taylor | 3.84 |
| Caleb | 1.31 |
| Spencer | 3.86 |
| Spencer | 1.31 |
| Andrew | 4.02 |
| Bill | 1.33 |
| Caleb | 4.04 |
| Andrew | 1.33 |
| Kate | 4.12 |
| Kate | 1.36 |
| Bill | 4.14 |
| Luke | 1.37 |
| Luke | 4.31 |
| Mark | 1.40 |
| Mark | 4.43 |
2 comments:
Some big differences between PEChone (ChoCOTA?) and ESPN here. Just looking at the 4 pitching stats available (ERA, WHIP, wins, Ks), Andrew gets 9 more points from PEChone, while Mark and I get 6 and 4 fewer points, respectively.
Maybe all of Andrew's picks weren't terrible after all.
Hmm, maybe BP is punishing me for not buying their 15 pound book this year. I've adjusted my pitching staff to hope to compete in WHIP and ERA. Wins, SO, and SV's will still be tricky. Don't think I can punt three categories and win it all...
Post a Comment